Product · Dormant
Skin Analysis
A guided skin questionnaire that ends in a generated assessment: a login, a question flow, a result screen and the route that produces it.
- verifiedSkin Analysis — 33 files, 1,998 lines
- Role
- Sole author — all 127 commits
- Period
- 2025-07 — 2025-12
- Next.js
- TypeScript
- Tailwind CSS
- React
The artifact
Fig. 1
What the routes describe
The repository holds four route areas and they describe the product without any need for prose about it: a login, a question flow, a result screen, and an API route behind them. It is a guided questionnaire that ends in a generated assessment rather than a form that ends in a submission.Why it was built, and for whom, is not established. The previous portfolio recorded a deployment under a different name from the repository, and the repository itself says nothing about a client. Both stay open.
- verifiedSkin Analysis — 33 files, 1,998 lines
Who built it
- Engineering role
- Sole author
- verifiedSkin Analysis — 127 commits, one author
- Measured contribution
- 127 of 127 commits (100%)the logon-skin-analysis repository
- verifiedSkin Analysis — 127 commits, one author
- Team
- Sole author. The history carries two author names, which are one person under two git identities.
- verifiedSkin Analysis — 127 commits, one author
How it is built
Next.js with the App Router, TypeScript and Tailwind, and a deliberately small dependency list — the only runtime dependencies beyond React and Next are icons. 33 source files and 1,998 lines across the four route areas, with the assessment produced behind an API route rather than in the browser.That is read from the source. Nothing here ran it, so nothing is claimed about what the assessment returns or how it is produced.
- verifiedSkin Analysis — 33 files, 1,998 lines
The product
Step through the sequence — every step is also readable in order without doing so.
- 01 — THE QUESTION FLOWFig. 2
The questionnaire is a guided flow rather than a form: one step at a time, in order.source · Skin Analysis — three captures of the application running locally - 02 — THE RESULT SCREENFig. 3
The result screen, rendering the sample analysis the project ships. The scores are its own placeholder data and the photograph is blank — this is what the screen looks like, not an assessment of anyone.source · Skin Analysis — three captures of the application running locally
What the repository shows
- Commits
- 127 commits
- verifiedSkin Analysis — 127 commits, one author
- Source
- 1,998 lines
- verifiedSkin Analysis — 33 files, 1,998 lines
Evidence
3 sources · how each was obtained
- verifiedSkin Analysis — 127 commits, one authorcommit-history · attests existence · captured 2026-08-19git log: 127 commits from 2025-07-09 to 2025-12-10, one person under two git identitiesLocal working copy. A second directory beside it, lagon-skin-analysis, is an unversioned four-file scaffold with a misspelt name and is not part of this project.
- verifiedSkin Analysis — 33 files, 1,998 linesrepository · attests structure · captured 2026-08-19read and counted: Next.js App Router with four route areas — login, questions, analysis-result and api — on TypeScript and Tailwind, with react-icons the only runtime dependency beyond React and NextProves how the code is written. Nothing here ran it, so nothing is claimed about what the assessment returns.
- verifiedSkin Analysis — three captures of the application running locallyFig. 1 · Fig. 2 · Fig. 3screenshot-set · attests existence · captured 2026-08-21the repository run on localhost and captured through Chrome's DevTools protocol at 1440x900: the landing page, the question flow, and the result screenThe result screen was requested through the application's own API with placeholder inputs, so the scores and text on it are the sample analysis the project ships and the photograph is a blank pixel. It shows what the screen looks like; it is not a real assessment of anyone, and nothing here claims the analysis is correct.
Links
Still open
What this case study does not yet cover, and what would close it.
Awaiting a written account
- The constraints this was built under were not recorded.
Never measured
- No outcome was measured while this project was active.
Awaiting first-person reflection
- What this project taught has not been written up yet.
- The alternatives that were considered were not recorded.
- A first-hand account of this work has not been written yet.
- The reasoning behind the engineering decisions has not been written up yet.